The specter of accountability

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71611/1/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03346.x.pd

A matter of moral perspective

In the USA, treatment for alcohol and drug problems is provided in both the public and private sectors. But because there is no universal health insurance scheme, access to treatment is severely limited. This unfortunate situation may be a consequence of an historically influential moral perspective on poverty and illness. An alternative perspective is urged.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75191/1/j.1360-0443.1991.tb02620.x.pd

Slouching toward a systems approach to treatment

Both the health care sector generally and the alcohol and drug field are moving toward a truly systematic approach to treatment, accelerated by the anticipated advent of health care reform. There is considerable reluctance to develop systems. Many are not convinced of their necessity, and systematization inevitably involves a decrement in autonomy for the components of the system. Nor are systems panaceas; they have problems of their own, such as the bottleneck. But only true systems will be able to cope with the expected increase in demand for services that will accompany the universal entitlement of health care reform. Recent work giving the alcohol and drug treatment field an edge in systems development is discussed. Regrettably, the main motivation for deploying systems has become economic. They would more appropriately be justified by their potential for enhancing the efficacy of treatment.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/31220/1/0000122.pd

Obsessive and Compulsive Characteristics of Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Abuse and Dependence

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65211/1/j.1530-0277.1992.tb01375.x.pd

Effect of Haloperidol on Measures of Craving and Impaired Control in Alcoholic * Subjects

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66324/1/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00755.x.pd

Representational predicaments at three Hong Kong sites

Representational predicaments arise when a job incumbent believes that attributions and images assumed by dominant authorities unfavourably ignore, or disproportionately and unfavourably emphasize, aspects of the incumbent\u27s own work and social identity. This is likely to happen when the incumbent does not have a close relationship with a dominant authority, and when power asymmetries give the former relatively little control over which aspects of their work and social identity are made visible or invisible to the latter. We draw on critical incident interviews from three organizations to illustrate a typology of six types of representational predicament: invasive spotlighting, idiosyncratic spotlighting, embedded background work, paradoxical social visibility, standardization of work processes, and standardization of work outputs. We analyse responses to representational predicaments according to whether they entailed exit, voice, loyalty, or neglect. Incumbents tended to respond with loyalty if they felt able and willing to accommodate their work behaviour and/or social identity to the dominant representations, and if there were sufficient compensatory factors, such as intrinsic rewards from the work or solidarity with colleagues. Exit or neglect appeared to reflect the belief that it was impossible to accommodate. Power asymmetries appeared to deter voice. Individual employees with a close and cordial working relationship with a member of a dominant authority group, or who were relationally networked to one, appeared not to experience representational predicaments